FAILURE OF DE’BROGLIE CONCEPTS.
NAME OF SCIENTIST:MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR.
THEOREICAL PARTICLE ASTROSCIENTIST
PLACE OF RESEARCH: MUNISHKUMAR'S SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE,NEAR BHAIRI WELL BOYER STREET(BHOVI STREET),SHORAPUR,KARNATAKA STATE,INDIA.
E-mail:www.MChinnakar@gmail.com.
OR
E-mail:www.mchinnakar@gmail.com.
NUMBER OF CO-WORKERS : No co-workers.
DATE OF RESEARCH: SEPTEMBER,13,14,2011
DATE OF ENTRY OF RESEARCH WORK:SEPTMBER,17,2011.
Albert Einstein was right with his Equation E=mC^2,where this Equation is valid for Energy of Matter and Energy of Radiation.But as such this Equation is not valid to calculate Energy of free Space.This happens becuase average nature of free space eventhough shows Constancy of Velocity of Light still contents of free space are Tacyonic type of Particles which are moving with high Velocities greater than C.
The same is not valid if you use same Equation E=mC^2 at a time for Comparision of Energy of Matter with Energy of Radiation.This was neglected by Compton and De’Broglie.Therefore they supported Wave nature for Matter.As a Consequence today Quantum Wave Mechanics was one of the biggest Branch in Physics.But according My Theories this Branch is purely Mathematical in Nature.
When you comapre Matter with Radiation you need to use correction factors which makes the Comparision valid for both as Radiation or both as Matter.If you compare as such then you are creating Duality(which is not existing there) and further if you uses Mathematical nature of Wave Theories to Equate the Natures ,then Experiment also deceives you about existence of Matter Waves.Such types of Faults were done by De’Broglie and next Developpers of Quantum Wave Mechanics.
But in the Calculation of Characteristic Energy equivalent Value of Material Particle, I Modified Compton frequency Equation using a Transformation Constant 10^-3 in order to be good with Comparision of Matter with Radiation,i,e using Equation of the type
h.f.10^-3=mC^2 …........(01) , instead of hf=mC^2.............(02).
This modified Equation(01) is Theoretically valid as relativistic Velocity,V reaches 1/V to account for Material particle nature at rest,hence f reaches 1/f.
Using above Equation (01) I calculated Modified Compton Frequencies[1] of Electron,Proton.These values aggreed with observed events like Abudance of Proton and Neutron in Vast infinite Universe.
In considering Equation (01) I am not using Wave nature but I am using Particle nature Alone.Further Wavelength or Frequency of Material Particle indicates total frequencies of Action M and Reaction M particles(which are moving with velocity C when alone) in that Particle.Note the Nature of M particles,their velocities here transformed from C to 1/C,therfore correction factor 10^-3 was needed in above Modified Equation.
Equation (01) gives different Modification to De’Broglie wave Equation.But a Truth you have to face.Kinetic energy given to the Particle is in Particle nature such that average velocity of Kinetic energy is C,this was associated with Material Particle.Here Material Particle simply moves with Kinetic energy and rarely oscillates.Thus sum of the oscillations of constituents of Kinetic Energy along with sum of Oscillations of constituents of Material Particle if taken at a time then you may say that Particle is vibrating.But Particle is not vibrating in most of the situations.It simply moves without noticable vibrations.(If vibrations are really counted as real total oscillation,Night wind would have Radiated!,this is not the case).Therefore Matter waves are not existing.
Further My Theories strongly assert the fact that Radiation strictly shows Particle nature.Only at rest this radiation shows nature of oscillation such that sum of low frequencies as a High value of Total frequencies.
The above Theory directly disproved the existence of Matter Waves.
REFERENCE:[1] ROLE OF FREE SPACE IN CREATION OF ABUNDANT FREQUENCIES, BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR IN MUNISHKUMAR’S SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE,SHORAPUR,INDIA PUBLISHED DATED 15/9/2011,16/9/2011 IN MUNISHKUMAR CHINNAKAR’S BLOGGER IN GOOGLE.
NAME OF SCIENTIST:MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR.
THEOREICAL PARTICLE ASTROSCIENTIST
PLACE OF RESEARCH: MUNISHKUMAR'S SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE,NEAR BHAIRI WELL BOYER STREET(BHOVI STREET),SHORAPUR,KARNATAKA STATE,INDIA.
E-mail:www.MChinnakar@gmail.com.
OR
E-mail:www.mchinnakar@gmail.com.
NUMBER OF CO-WORKERS : No co-workers.
DATE OF RESEARCH: SEPTEMBER,13,14,2011
DATE OF ENTRY OF RESEARCH WORK:SEPTMBER,17,2011.
Albert Einstein was right with his Equation E=mC^2,where this Equation is valid for Energy of Matter and Energy of Radiation.But as such this Equation is not valid to calculate Energy of free Space.This happens becuase average nature of free space eventhough shows Constancy of Velocity of Light still contents of free space are Tacyonic type of Particles which are moving with high Velocities greater than C.
The same is not valid if you use same Equation E=mC^2 at a time for Comparision of Energy of Matter with Energy of Radiation.This was neglected by Compton and De’Broglie.Therefore they supported Wave nature for Matter.As a Consequence today Quantum Wave Mechanics was one of the biggest Branch in Physics.But according My Theories this Branch is purely Mathematical in Nature.
When you comapre Matter with Radiation you need to use correction factors which makes the Comparision valid for both as Radiation or both as Matter.If you compare as such then you are creating Duality(which is not existing there) and further if you uses Mathematical nature of Wave Theories to Equate the Natures ,then Experiment also deceives you about existence of Matter Waves.Such types of Faults were done by De’Broglie and next Developpers of Quantum Wave Mechanics.
But in the Calculation of Characteristic Energy equivalent Value of Material Particle, I Modified Compton frequency Equation using a Transformation Constant 10^-3 in order to be good with Comparision of Matter with Radiation,i,e using Equation of the type
h.f.10^-3=mC^2 …........(01) , instead of hf=mC^2.............(02).
This modified Equation(01) is Theoretically valid as relativistic Velocity,V reaches 1/V to account for Material particle nature at rest,hence f reaches 1/f.
Using above Equation (01) I calculated Modified Compton Frequencies[1] of Electron,Proton.These values aggreed with observed events like Abudance of Proton and Neutron in Vast infinite Universe.
In considering Equation (01) I am not using Wave nature but I am using Particle nature Alone.Further Wavelength or Frequency of Material Particle indicates total frequencies of Action M and Reaction M particles(which are moving with velocity C when alone) in that Particle.Note the Nature of M particles,their velocities here transformed from C to 1/C,therfore correction factor 10^-3 was needed in above Modified Equation.
Equation (01) gives different Modification to De’Broglie wave Equation.But a Truth you have to face.Kinetic energy given to the Particle is in Particle nature such that average velocity of Kinetic energy is C,this was associated with Material Particle.Here Material Particle simply moves with Kinetic energy and rarely oscillates.Thus sum of the oscillations of constituents of Kinetic Energy along with sum of Oscillations of constituents of Material Particle if taken at a time then you may say that Particle is vibrating.But Particle is not vibrating in most of the situations.It simply moves without noticable vibrations.(If vibrations are really counted as real total oscillation,Night wind would have Radiated!,this is not the case).Therefore Matter waves are not existing.
Further My Theories strongly assert the fact that Radiation strictly shows Particle nature.Only at rest this radiation shows nature of oscillation such that sum of low frequencies as a High value of Total frequencies.
The above Theory directly disproved the existence of Matter Waves.
REFERENCE:[1] ROLE OF FREE SPACE IN CREATION OF ABUNDANT FREQUENCIES, BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR IN MUNISHKUMAR’S SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTRE,SHORAPUR,INDIA PUBLISHED DATED 15/9/2011,16/9/2011 IN MUNISHKUMAR CHINNAKAR’S BLOGGER IN GOOGLE.
No comments:
Post a Comment