VALIDITIES OF SCIENTIFIC THEORIES.
NAME OF AUTHOR:MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR
Theoretical particle astroscientist
DATE OF ENTRY OF DOCUMENT:JUNE,14,2013.
DATE OF REENTRY OF DOCUMENT:JUNE,15,2013.
Any Scientific Theory if termed as Theory should have a Theoretical reference.If not then it suffers from Draw backs. This was evident from different Theories like Newtonian Theories and Einstein’s Theories,Planck theories.This happened because of reference as Experimental observations.
Following are the validities of different Theories by me and by others
(01) SUBSUPERSPACE THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………VALID UP TO 100%....NO DRAW BACKS……AS AVERAGE NATURE OF FREE SPACE PARTICLES MAKE CONSTANCY OF VELOCITY OF FASTLY MOVING PARTICLES AS THAT OF LIGHT……..ACCURATE FORMULATIONS…….EXPLAINS CREATION OF SUPERSPACE PARTICLES…….EXPLAINS WHY FREE SPACE IS LIKE THAT ?...AS PURE ENERGY AND EXISTED IN PAST AND ALWAYS EXISTING IN FEATURE…….USES MY EQUATION E=rC^4.
(02) SUBSUPERSPACE THEORIES BY OTHERS………BLOCKS THE REASONS FOR EXISTENCE OF UNIVERSE……BUILDS VIRTUAL NATURE AND PHYSICAL REALITY AS OF NOTHING……FACES DRAW BACKS……..APPROACHES CORRECT MATHEMATICS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE WITHOUT LIMITING VALUES ………EXPLAINS CREATION OF SUPERSPACE PARTICLE UNCERTAINLY.
(03) SUPERSPACE THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………..VALID UP TO 100%......NO DRAW BACKS…….EXPLAINS CREATION OF MATERIAL PARTICLES/RADIATION PARTICLES/ ENERGY PARTICLES CERTAINLY ……..EXPLAINS REASONS FOR STRUCTURES OF PARTICLES.
(04) SUPERSPACE THEORIES BY OTHERS……….NOT VALID….EXPLAINS CREATION OF VIRTUAL PARTICLES…….FACES DRAW BACKS……GOOD FOR MATHEMATICS AND BAD FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE…….FACE COINCIDING EFFECT IN CASE OF NEGATIVE CHARGE AS NOT EXISTING PARTICLE.
(05) PARTICLE/ELEMENTARY PARTICLE THEORY BY UNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……..VALID UP TO 100%......NO DRAW BACKS…….ACCOUNTS FOR LOW VELOCITY SPIN…..USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF PARTICLES……..USES 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS AS VECTORIAL 4D AND USES 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS AT A TIME AS VECTORIAL 1D…….USES MY MODIFIED PARTICLE QUANTUM MECHANICS AND MODIFIED SPECIAL RELATIVITY
(06) PARTICLE THEORY BY OTHERS……..LIKE STANDARD MODEL……USES MATHEMATICS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE……VALID UP O 50%......SOME TIMES VALID AND SOME TIMES INVALID ACCORDING TO THE NATURE OF MATHEMATICS…….PREDICTS LOT OF PARTICLES……PREDICTS EXISTENCE OF QUARKS WHICH ARE CREATING DUE TO SUPPLIED HIGH ENERGY………CONSIDERS KINETIC ENERGY GIVEN TO THE PARTICLE AS KINETIC ENERGY OF SPIN OF NON-ROTATING PARTICLE.
(07) NUCLEAR THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……….VALID UP TO 100%.......EXPLAINS THE STRUCTURE AND NON-REVOLVING NATURE OF NUCLEONS ARROUND ONE ANOTHER……..USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF NUCLEI……….HELPS TO BUILD CORRECT ATOMIC STRUCTURE………EXPLAINS NUCLEAR FORCE AS 1000 TIMES STRONGER THAN ELECTRIC FORCE………..EXPLAINS SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT OF NEUTRAL CHARGED PARTICLES.
(08) NUCLEAR THEORIES BY OTHERS……….VALID UP TO 90%............PREDICTS REVOLVING NATURE OF NUCLEONS ARROUND ONE ANOTHER……….FACES DRAW BACKS…..DO NOT EXPLAIN ORIGIN OF SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT OF NEUTRAL CHARGED PARTICLE.
(09) ATOMIC THEORIES MY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR ………….VALID UP TO 100%..............USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF PARTICLES……..CORRECTLY FIXES RANGE OF NUCLEAR FIELD(POLARISATION OF FREE SPACE CHARGES ARROUND PARTICLE) ,ELECTRIC CHARGED/NEUTRAL FIELD(POLARISATION),GRAVITATIONAL FIELD(POLARISATION)……….ARRIVED AT BHOR’S QUATISATION……EXPLAINS SPIN,MAGNETIC MOMENT,THEORETICAL STRUCTURES CAN BE VERIFIED BY EXPERIMENTS…..CONSTUCTS MOLECULES…
(10) ATOMIC THEORIES BY OTHERS………VALID UP TO 90%......FACES DRAW BACKS……..EXPLAINS NON-ROTATING ATOMS AS ROTATING ATOMS AS EXTRA GIVEN ENERGY OF TRANSLATION IS USED AS ROTATING ENERGY DUE TO SMALLER SIZE CURVED SURFACE OF ATOM WITHOUT ANY ROTATION.
(11) MOLECULAR THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………VALID UP TO 100%........NO DRAW BACKS
(12) MOLECULAR THEORIES BY OTHERS…………VALID UP TO 99%.........FACES SOME DRAW BACKS
(13) THEORIES OF PLANETS/SATELITTES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……….VALID UP TO 100%.......NO DRAW BACKS.
(14) THEORIES OF PLANETS/STELITTES BY OTHERS……………VALID UP TO 50%.........DRAW BACKS AND DIFFERENT EXPLAINATIONS
(15) THEORIES OF STARS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…………VALID UP TO 100%......NO DRAW BACKS
(16) THEORIES OF STARS BY OTHERS………..VALID UP TO 50%.........FACES DRAW BACKS……PREDICTS MORE TYPES OF STARS………ACCOUNTS FOR HIGH SPIN STARS WITHOUT HIGH SPIN
(17) THEORIES OF GALAXY BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…………VALID UP TO 100%.........NO DRAW BACKS
(18) THEORIES OF UNIVERSE BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………….VALID UP TO 100%.......NO DRAW BACKS
(19) THEORIES OF UNIVERSE BY OTHERS……….VALID UP TO 40%............FACES DRAW BACKS……DIFFERENT COINCIDING EXPLAINATIONS…….USES MATHEMATICS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE.
(20) THEORY OF CREATION OF BIOLOGICAL CELL BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……..VALID UP TO 100%.......USES SPECIAL RELATIVISTIC METHODS
(21) THEORY OF CREATION OF BIOLOGICAL CELL BY OTHERS……..VALID UP TO 90%.....USES DIFFERENT REASONS….. NOT USING TRANSFORMATION CONSTANTS
(22) CERTAIN THEORIES IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……….USES INFINITE EQUIVALENT VALUES…..LIMITS THE MATHEMATICS AT 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS……TREATS THE MATHEMATICS ABOVE 24 COMPONENT DIMENSION AS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE……….USES 1D MATHEMATICS AS INTEGRATING MEANS
(23) MATHEMATICAL THEORIES BY OTHERS…….VALID UP TO 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS AND NOT VALID ABOVE THIS……….NOT CONSIDERING VALUES OF INFINITY EQUIVALENTS….NOT USING 1D MATHEMATICS
(24) THEORIES IN PHYSICAL MATHEMATICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID…..EXPLAINS CONSISTANCY OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE WITH PURE SCIENCE.
(25) THEORIES IN PHYSICAL MATHEMATICS BY OTHERS……..PROBABLY NOT STARTED.
(26) THEORIES OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…..USES SPECIAL RELATIVISTIC PARTICLE QUANTUM MECHANICS…..NOT YET STARTED.
(27) THEORIES OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS BY OTHERS…….VALID UP TO 100% USING MIXED METHODS WITHOUT DEEPER REASONS.
(28) THEORIES OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR ……..VALID UP TO 100%....USES ABSOLUTE RADII/ENERGY OF PARTICLES……PERFECTLY EXPLAINED NEUTRINO OSCILLATION PROBLEM…….DISTINGUISHES ENERGY DENSITY FROM MASS DENSITY BY A FACTOR 10^20
(29) THEORIES OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%....... NOT CONSIDERING ANY ABSOLUTE VALUE FOR ENERGY WHICH HINDERED THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS BRANCH
(30) THEORIES OF BLACK HOLES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%....NO DRAW BACKS……USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF BLACK HOLES……..CORRECT VALUE OF RATE OF CREATION OF BLACK HOLE
(31) THEORIES OF BLACK HOLES BY OTHERS ……….VALID UP TO 90%.........FACES DRAW BACKS
(32) THEORIES OF DARK MATTER PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%.........CLASSIFIED DIFFERENT STRENGTH DARK MATTER PARTICLES…..CORRECTLY DEFINED….CORRECTLY ARRIVED AT DENSITY OF DARK MATTER’S SPACE
(33) THEORIES OF DARK MATTER PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%.......FACES DRAW BACKS……..TRIES TO LOOK TOWARDS NEW PHYSICS
(34) THEORIES OF DARK ENERGY PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%.........CLASSIFIED DIFFERENT STRENGTH DARK ENERGY PARTICLES…..CORRECTLY DEFINED….CORRECTLY ARRIVED AT DENSITY OF DARK ENERGY’S SPACE
(35) THEORIES OF DARK ENERGY PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%.......FACES DRAW BACKS……..TRIES TO LOOK TOWARDS NEW PHYSICS
(36) THEORIES OF DARK RADIATION PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%.........CLASSIFIED DIFFERENT STRENGTH DARK RADIATION PARTICLES…..CORRECTLY DEFINED….CORRECTLY ARRIVED AT DENSITY OF DARK RADIATION’S SPACE AND COSMIC RAYS
(37) THEORIES OF DARK RADIATION PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%.......FACES DRAW BACKS……..TRIES TO LOOK TOWARDS NEW PHYSICS
NOTE: FOR CLARIFICATION REFER MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR'S BLOGGERS/SITES IN GOOGLE AND ALSO REFER WIKIPEDIA IN GOOGLE.
NAME OF AUTHOR:MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR
Theoretical particle astroscientist
DATE OF ENTRY OF DOCUMENT:JUNE,14,2013.
DATE OF REENTRY OF DOCUMENT:JUNE,15,2013.
Any Scientific Theory if termed as Theory should have a Theoretical reference.If not then it suffers from Draw backs. This was evident from different Theories like Newtonian Theories and Einstein’s Theories,Planck theories.This happened because of reference as Experimental observations.
Following are the validities of different Theories by me and by others
(01) SUBSUPERSPACE THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………VALID UP TO 100%....NO DRAW BACKS……AS AVERAGE NATURE OF FREE SPACE PARTICLES MAKE CONSTANCY OF VELOCITY OF FASTLY MOVING PARTICLES AS THAT OF LIGHT……..ACCURATE FORMULATIONS…….EXPLAINS CREATION OF SUPERSPACE PARTICLES…….EXPLAINS WHY FREE SPACE IS LIKE THAT ?...AS PURE ENERGY AND EXISTED IN PAST AND ALWAYS EXISTING IN FEATURE…….USES MY EQUATION E=rC^4.
(02) SUBSUPERSPACE THEORIES BY OTHERS………BLOCKS THE REASONS FOR EXISTENCE OF UNIVERSE……BUILDS VIRTUAL NATURE AND PHYSICAL REALITY AS OF NOTHING……FACES DRAW BACKS……..APPROACHES CORRECT MATHEMATICS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE WITHOUT LIMITING VALUES ………EXPLAINS CREATION OF SUPERSPACE PARTICLE UNCERTAINLY.
(03) SUPERSPACE THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………..VALID UP TO 100%......NO DRAW BACKS…….EXPLAINS CREATION OF MATERIAL PARTICLES/RADIATION PARTICLES/ ENERGY PARTICLES CERTAINLY ……..EXPLAINS REASONS FOR STRUCTURES OF PARTICLES.
(04) SUPERSPACE THEORIES BY OTHERS……….NOT VALID….EXPLAINS CREATION OF VIRTUAL PARTICLES…….FACES DRAW BACKS……GOOD FOR MATHEMATICS AND BAD FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE…….FACE COINCIDING EFFECT IN CASE OF NEGATIVE CHARGE AS NOT EXISTING PARTICLE.
(05) PARTICLE/ELEMENTARY PARTICLE THEORY BY UNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……..VALID UP TO 100%......NO DRAW BACKS…….ACCOUNTS FOR LOW VELOCITY SPIN…..USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF PARTICLES……..USES 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS AS VECTORIAL 4D AND USES 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS AT A TIME AS VECTORIAL 1D…….USES MY MODIFIED PARTICLE QUANTUM MECHANICS AND MODIFIED SPECIAL RELATIVITY
(06) PARTICLE THEORY BY OTHERS……..LIKE STANDARD MODEL……USES MATHEMATICS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE……VALID UP O 50%......SOME TIMES VALID AND SOME TIMES INVALID ACCORDING TO THE NATURE OF MATHEMATICS…….PREDICTS LOT OF PARTICLES……PREDICTS EXISTENCE OF QUARKS WHICH ARE CREATING DUE TO SUPPLIED HIGH ENERGY………CONSIDERS KINETIC ENERGY GIVEN TO THE PARTICLE AS KINETIC ENERGY OF SPIN OF NON-ROTATING PARTICLE.
(07) NUCLEAR THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……….VALID UP TO 100%.......EXPLAINS THE STRUCTURE AND NON-REVOLVING NATURE OF NUCLEONS ARROUND ONE ANOTHER……..USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF NUCLEI……….HELPS TO BUILD CORRECT ATOMIC STRUCTURE………EXPLAINS NUCLEAR FORCE AS 1000 TIMES STRONGER THAN ELECTRIC FORCE………..EXPLAINS SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT OF NEUTRAL CHARGED PARTICLES.
(08) NUCLEAR THEORIES BY OTHERS……….VALID UP TO 90%............PREDICTS REVOLVING NATURE OF NUCLEONS ARROUND ONE ANOTHER……….FACES DRAW BACKS…..DO NOT EXPLAIN ORIGIN OF SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENT OF NEUTRAL CHARGED PARTICLE.
(09) ATOMIC THEORIES MY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR ………….VALID UP TO 100%..............USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF PARTICLES……..CORRECTLY FIXES RANGE OF NUCLEAR FIELD(POLARISATION OF FREE SPACE CHARGES ARROUND PARTICLE) ,ELECTRIC CHARGED/NEUTRAL FIELD(POLARISATION),GRAVITATIONAL FIELD(POLARISATION)……….ARRIVED AT BHOR’S QUATISATION……EXPLAINS SPIN,MAGNETIC MOMENT,THEORETICAL STRUCTURES CAN BE VERIFIED BY EXPERIMENTS…..CONSTUCTS MOLECULES…
(10) ATOMIC THEORIES BY OTHERS………VALID UP TO 90%......FACES DRAW BACKS……..EXPLAINS NON-ROTATING ATOMS AS ROTATING ATOMS AS EXTRA GIVEN ENERGY OF TRANSLATION IS USED AS ROTATING ENERGY DUE TO SMALLER SIZE CURVED SURFACE OF ATOM WITHOUT ANY ROTATION.
(11) MOLECULAR THEORIES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………VALID UP TO 100%........NO DRAW BACKS
(12) MOLECULAR THEORIES BY OTHERS…………VALID UP TO 99%.........FACES SOME DRAW BACKS
(13) THEORIES OF PLANETS/SATELITTES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……….VALID UP TO 100%.......NO DRAW BACKS.
(14) THEORIES OF PLANETS/STELITTES BY OTHERS……………VALID UP TO 50%.........DRAW BACKS AND DIFFERENT EXPLAINATIONS
(15) THEORIES OF STARS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…………VALID UP TO 100%......NO DRAW BACKS
(16) THEORIES OF STARS BY OTHERS………..VALID UP TO 50%.........FACES DRAW BACKS……PREDICTS MORE TYPES OF STARS………ACCOUNTS FOR HIGH SPIN STARS WITHOUT HIGH SPIN
(17) THEORIES OF GALAXY BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…………VALID UP TO 100%.........NO DRAW BACKS
(18) THEORIES OF UNIVERSE BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR………….VALID UP TO 100%.......NO DRAW BACKS
(19) THEORIES OF UNIVERSE BY OTHERS……….VALID UP TO 40%............FACES DRAW BACKS……DIFFERENT COINCIDING EXPLAINATIONS…….USES MATHEMATICS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE.
(20) THEORY OF CREATION OF BIOLOGICAL CELL BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……..VALID UP TO 100%.......USES SPECIAL RELATIVISTIC METHODS
(21) THEORY OF CREATION OF BIOLOGICAL CELL BY OTHERS……..VALID UP TO 90%.....USES DIFFERENT REASONS….. NOT USING TRANSFORMATION CONSTANTS
(22) CERTAIN THEORIES IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR……….USES INFINITE EQUIVALENT VALUES…..LIMITS THE MATHEMATICS AT 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS……TREATS THE MATHEMATICS ABOVE 24 COMPONENT DIMENSION AS NOT MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE……….USES 1D MATHEMATICS AS INTEGRATING MEANS
(23) MATHEMATICAL THEORIES BY OTHERS…….VALID UP TO 24 COMPONENT DIMENSIONS AND NOT VALID ABOVE THIS……….NOT CONSIDERING VALUES OF INFINITY EQUIVALENTS….NOT USING 1D MATHEMATICS
(24) THEORIES IN PHYSICAL MATHEMATICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID…..EXPLAINS CONSISTANCY OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCE WITH PURE SCIENCE.
(25) THEORIES IN PHYSICAL MATHEMATICS BY OTHERS……..PROBABLY NOT STARTED.
(26) THEORIES OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…..USES SPECIAL RELATIVISTIC PARTICLE QUANTUM MECHANICS…..NOT YET STARTED.
(27) THEORIES OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS BY OTHERS…….VALID UP TO 100% USING MIXED METHODS WITHOUT DEEPER REASONS.
(28) THEORIES OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR ……..VALID UP TO 100%....USES ABSOLUTE RADII/ENERGY OF PARTICLES……PERFECTLY EXPLAINED NEUTRINO OSCILLATION PROBLEM…….DISTINGUISHES ENERGY DENSITY FROM MASS DENSITY BY A FACTOR 10^20
(29) THEORIES OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%....... NOT CONSIDERING ANY ABSOLUTE VALUE FOR ENERGY WHICH HINDERED THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS BRANCH
(30) THEORIES OF BLACK HOLES BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%....NO DRAW BACKS……USES ABSOLUTE RADII OF BLACK HOLES……..CORRECT VALUE OF RATE OF CREATION OF BLACK HOLE
(31) THEORIES OF BLACK HOLES BY OTHERS ……….VALID UP TO 90%.........FACES DRAW BACKS
(32) THEORIES OF DARK MATTER PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%.........CLASSIFIED DIFFERENT STRENGTH DARK MATTER PARTICLES…..CORRECTLY DEFINED….CORRECTLY ARRIVED AT DENSITY OF DARK MATTER’S SPACE
(33) THEORIES OF DARK MATTER PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%.......FACES DRAW BACKS……..TRIES TO LOOK TOWARDS NEW PHYSICS
(34) THEORIES OF DARK ENERGY PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%.........CLASSIFIED DIFFERENT STRENGTH DARK ENERGY PARTICLES…..CORRECTLY DEFINED….CORRECTLY ARRIVED AT DENSITY OF DARK ENERGY’S SPACE
(35) THEORIES OF DARK ENERGY PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%.......FACES DRAW BACKS……..TRIES TO LOOK TOWARDS NEW PHYSICS
(36) THEORIES OF DARK RADIATION PHYSICS BY MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR…….VALID UP TO 100%.........CLASSIFIED DIFFERENT STRENGTH DARK RADIATION PARTICLES…..CORRECTLY DEFINED….CORRECTLY ARRIVED AT DENSITY OF DARK RADIATION’S SPACE AND COSMIC RAYS
(37) THEORIES OF DARK RADIATION PHYSICS BY OTHERS……VALID UP TO 90%.......FACES DRAW BACKS……..TRIES TO LOOK TOWARDS NEW PHYSICS
NOTE: FOR CLARIFICATION REFER MUNISHKUMAR.B.CHINNAKAR'S BLOGGERS/SITES IN GOOGLE AND ALSO REFER WIKIPEDIA IN GOOGLE.
No comments:
Post a Comment